1999 Renault Clio vs. 1996 Rover 200
To start off, 1999 Renault Clio is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Rover 200 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Rover 200 weights approximately 200 kg more than 1999 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Renault Clio | 1996 Rover 200 | |
Make | Renault | Rover |
Model | Clio | 200 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 85 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 935 kg | 1135 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2510 mm |