1999 Renault Clio vs. 1996 Toyota Cresta
To start off, 1999 Renault Clio is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Toyota Cresta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Toyota Cresta would be higher. At 1,968 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Toyota Cresta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Toyota Cresta (158 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1999 Renault Clio. (59 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Toyota Cresta should accelerate faster than 1999 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Toyota Cresta weights approximately 464 kg more than 1999 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1996 Toyota Cresta is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Toyota Cresta. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Toyota Cresta (200 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Renault Clio. (93 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1996 Toyota Cresta will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Renault Clio. 1996 Toyota Cresta has automatic transmission and 1999 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 1999 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Toyota Cresta will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Renault Clio | 1996 Toyota Cresta | |
Make | Renault | Toyota |
Model | Clio | Cresta |
Year Released | 1999 | 1996 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1149 cc | 1968 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 93 Nm | 200 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 69.1 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.8 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 880 kg | 1344 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2740 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 70 L |