1999 Renault Clio vs. 2001 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2001 Toyota Tundra is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Renault Clio would be higher.
Because 2001 Toyota Tundra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Toyota Tundra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Renault Clio | 2001 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Renault | Toyota |
| Model | Clio | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2001 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 245 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 5530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1920 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 3270 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 45 L |
