1999 Renault Clio vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Renault Clio would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 135 kg more than 1999 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Renault Clio | 2005 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Renault | Mitsubishi |
Model | Clio | Colt |
Year Released | 1999 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 94 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Top Speed | 181 km/hour | 180 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 935 kg | 1070 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.2 L/100km | 4.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 47 L |