1999 Renault Clio vs. 2008 Acura CSX
To start off, 2008 Acura CSX is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Renault Clio would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Acura CSX weights approximately 408 kg more than 1999 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Renault Clio | 2008 Acura CSX | |
| Make | Renault | Acura |
| Model | Clio | CSX |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 155 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 935 kg | 1343 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4544 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1752 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1435 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 5.8 L/100km | 6.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 9.6 L/100km | 9.5 L/100km |
