1999 Renault Megan vs. 2010 Ford F-150
To start off, 2010 Ford F-150 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Renault Megan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Renault Megan would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2010 Ford F-150 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Ford F-150. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Renault Megan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Ford F-150 has automatic transmission and 1999 Renault Megan has manual transmission. 1999 Renault Megan will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Ford F-150 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Renault Megan | 2010 Ford F-150 | |
Make | Renault | Ford |
Model | Megan | F-150 |
Year Released | 1999 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2000 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 310 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |