1999 Renault Safrane vs. 1965 Seat 600
To start off, 1999 Renault Safrane is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Seat 600 would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Renault Safrane is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Renault Safrane weights approximately 1005 kg more than 1965 Seat 600.
Because 1965 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Renault Safrane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Renault Safrane (277 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 230 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Seat 600. (47 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1999 Renault Safrane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Renault Safrane | 1965 Seat 600 | |
| Make | Renault | Seat |
| Model | Safrane | 600 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2946 cc | 767 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 191 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 277 Nm | 47 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1580 kg | 575 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 3300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1390 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2010 mm |
