1999 Renault Scenic vs. 1996 Rover 200
To start off, 1999 Renault Scenic is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Rover 200 would be higher. At 1,395 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Rover 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Rover 200 (102 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1999 Renault Scenic. (93 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 1999 Renault Scenic. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Renault Scenic weights approximately 280 kg more than 1996 Rover 200.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 127 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Renault Scenic | 1996 Rover 200 | |
Make | Renault | Rover |
Model | Scenic | 200 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1389 cc | 1395 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 127 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2510 mm |