1999 Renault Zo vs. 1973 Volvo 164
To start off, 1999 Renault Zo is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Volvo 164. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Volvo 164 would be higher. At 2,976 cc (6 cylinders), 1973 Volvo 164 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Volvo 164 (142 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1999 Renault Zo. (74 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1973 Volvo 164 should accelerate faster than 1999 Renault Zo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Renault Zo weights approximately 215 kg more than 1973 Volvo 164.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Renault Zo (260 Nm) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Volvo 164. (221 Nm). This means 1999 Renault Zo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Volvo 164.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Renault Zo | 1973 Volvo 164 | |
Make | Renault | Volvo |
Model | Zo | 164 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 2976 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 142 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 221 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 1360 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 58 L |