1999 Renault Zo vs. 2001 Toyota MR2

To start off, 2001 Toyota MR2 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Renault Zo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Renault Zo would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Renault Zo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Toyota MR2 (140 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1999 Renault Zo. (74 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Toyota MR2 should accelerate faster than 1999 Renault Zo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Toyota MR2 weights approximately 35 kg more than 1999 Renault Zo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Renault Zo (260 Nm) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Toyota MR2. (170 Nm). This means 1999 Renault Zo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Toyota MR2. 1999 Renault Zo has automatic transmission and 2001 Toyota MR2 has manual transmission. 2001 Toyota MR2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Renault Zo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: