1999 Renault Zo vs. 2002 Acura CL

To start off, 2002 Acura CL is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Renault Zo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Renault Zo would be higher. At 3,210 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Acura CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Acura CL (260 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 186 more horse power than 1999 Renault Zo. (74 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 1999 Renault Zo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Acura CL weights approximately 5 kg more than 1999 Renault Zo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1999 Renault Zo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Renault Zo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Acura CL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Acura CL (315 Nm) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Renault Zo. (260 Nm). This means 2002 Acura CL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Renault Zo.

Compare all specifications: