1999 Renault Zo vs. 2002 Proton Impian
To start off, 2002 Proton Impian is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Renault Zo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Renault Zo would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Renault Zo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Proton Impian (102 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1999 Renault Zo. (74 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Proton Impian should accelerate faster than 1999 Renault Zo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Renault Zo weights approximately 370 kg more than 2002 Proton Impian.
Because 1999 Renault Zo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Renault Zo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Proton Impian, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Renault Zo (260 Nm) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Proton Impian. (140 Nm). This means 1999 Renault Zo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Proton Impian.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Renault Zo | 2002 Proton Impian | |
| Make | Renault | Proton |
| Model | Zo | Impian |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2002 |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1584 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 102 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 260 Nm | 140 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 1205 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2610 mm |
