1999 Renault Zo vs. 2011 Acura RDX

To start off, 2011 Acura RDX is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Renault Zo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Renault Zo would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Acura RDX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Acura RDX (240 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 166 more horse power than 1999 Renault Zo. (74 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Acura RDX should accelerate faster than 1999 Renault Zo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Acura RDX weights approximately 123 kg more than 1999 Renault Zo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1999 Renault Zo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Renault Zo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Acura RDX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Acura RDX (352 Nm) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Renault Zo. (260 Nm). This means 2011 Acura RDX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Renault Zo.

Compare all specifications: