1999 Renault Zo vs. 2012 Chrysler Ypsilon
To start off, 2012 Chrysler Ypsilon is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Renault Zo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Renault Zo would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Renault Zo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chrysler Ypsilon (94 HP) has 20 more horse power than 1999 Renault Zo. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chrysler Ypsilon should accelerate faster than 1999 Renault Zo.
Because 1999 Renault Zo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Renault Zo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chrysler Ypsilon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1999 Renault Zo has automatic transmission and 2012 Chrysler Ypsilon has manual transmission. 2012 Chrysler Ypsilon will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Renault Zo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Renault Zo | 2012 Chrysler Ypsilon | |
| Make | Renault | Chrysler |
| Model | Zo | Ypsilon |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1248 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 94 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2390 mm |
