1999 Renault Zo vs. 2012 Mazda 3

To start off, 2012 Mazda 3 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Renault Zo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Renault Zo would be higher. At 2,184 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda 3 (148 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1999 Renault Zo. (74 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1999 Renault Zo.

Because 1999 Renault Zo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Renault Zo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda 3 (360 Nm) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Renault Zo. (260 Nm). This means 2012 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Renault Zo. 1999 Renault Zo has automatic transmission and 2012 Mazda 3 has manual transmission. 2012 Mazda 3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Renault Zo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: