1999 Renault Zo vs. 2012 Nissan Cube
To start off, 2012 Nissan Cube is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Renault Zo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Renault Zo would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Renault Zo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan Cube (122 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1999 Renault Zo. (74 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Cube should accelerate faster than 1999 Renault Zo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Renault Zo weights approximately 286 kg more than 2012 Nissan Cube.
Because 1999 Renault Zo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Renault Zo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Cube, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Renault Zo (260 Nm) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Nissan Cube. (172 Nm). This means 1999 Renault Zo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Nissan Cube.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Renault Zo | 2012 Nissan Cube | |
Make | Renault | Nissan |
Model | Zo | Cube |
Year Released | 1999 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 172 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 1289 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 50 L |