1999 Renault Zo vs. 2013 Ford Escape

To start off, 2013 Ford Escape is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Renault Zo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Renault Zo would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Ford Escape is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford Escape (166 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1999 Renault Zo. (74 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford Escape should accelerate faster than 1999 Renault Zo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford Escape weights approximately 23 kg more than 1999 Renault Zo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1999 Renault Zo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Renault Zo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Ford Escape, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Renault Zo (260 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Ford Escape. (230 Nm). This means 1999 Renault Zo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Ford Escape.

Compare all specifications: