1999 Renault Zo vs. 2013 Mini Roadster
To start off, 2013 Mini Roadster is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Renault Zo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Renault Zo would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Renault Zo weights approximately 380 kg more than 2013 Mini Roadster.
Because 1999 Renault Zo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Renault Zo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Roadster, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Renault Zo (260 Nm) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Roadster. (160 Nm). This means 1999 Renault Zo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Roadster. 1999 Renault Zo has automatic transmission and 2013 Mini Roadster has manual transmission. 2013 Mini Roadster will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Renault Zo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Renault Zo | 2013 Mini Roadster | |
| Make | Renault | Mini |
| Model | Zo | Roadster |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 260 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 1195 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2467 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 50 L |
