1999 Rolls-Royce Corniche vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Rolls-Royce Corniche. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Rolls-Royce Corniche would be higher.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Rolls-Royce Corniche (738 Nm) has 608 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Smart Fortwo. (130 Nm). This means 1999 Rolls-Royce Corniche will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Rolls-Royce Corniche | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
Make | Rolls-Royce | Smart |
Model | Corniche | Fortwo |
Year Released | 1999 | 2013 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Type | V | electric |
Horse Power | 325 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 738 Nm | 130 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5410 mm | 2695 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1542 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3070 mm | 1867 mm |