1999 Rover 200 vs. 2010 Peugeot 408
To start off, 2010 Peugeot 408 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Rover 200 would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Peugeot 408 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Peugeot 408 (143 HP) has 41 more horse power than 1999 Rover 200. (102 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 408 should accelerate faster than 1999 Rover 200.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Peugeot 408 (240 Nm) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Rover 200. (127 Nm). This means 2010 Peugeot 408 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Rover 200 | 2010 Peugeot 408 | |
| Make | Rover | Peugeot |
| Model | 200 | 408 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1396 cc | 1560 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 102 HP | 143 HP |
| Torque | 127 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3980 mm | 4680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1815 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1525 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2710 mm |
