1999 Rover 75 vs. 1997 Acura TL
To start off, 1999 Rover 75 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Acura TL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Acura TL would be higher. At 2,500 cc (5 cylinders), 1997 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Acura TL (176 HP) has 58 more horse power than 1999 Rover 75. (118 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1999 Rover 75.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1997 Acura TL has automatic transmission and 1999 Rover 75 has manual transmission. 1999 Rover 75 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Acura TL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Rover 75 | 1997 Acura TL | |
| Make | Rover | Acura |
| Model | 75 | TL |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1795 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 176 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4864 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1786 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1405 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2840 mm |
