1999 Rover 75 vs. 2010 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2010 Toyota Matrix is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Rover 75 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota Matrix (158 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1999 Rover 75. (118 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1999 Rover 75.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Toyota Matrix (219 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Rover 75. (160 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2010 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Rover 75 | 2010 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Rover | Toyota |
Model | 75 | Matrix |
Year Released | 1999 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1795 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 219 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1390 kg | 1390 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4394 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2601 mm |