1999 Saab 05-Sep vs. 1962 Zastava 750
To start off, 1999 Saab 05-Sep is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Zastava 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Zastava 750 would be higher. At 1,985 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Saab 05-Sep is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Saab 05-Sep (188 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 164 more horse power than 1962 Zastava 750. (24 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Saab 05-Sep should accelerate faster than 1962 Zastava 750.
Because 1962 Zastava 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Zastava 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Saab 05-Sep, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Saab 05-Sep (300 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 254 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Zastava 750. (46 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1999 Saab 05-Sep will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Zastava 750.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Saab 05-Sep | 1962 Zastava 750 | |
| Make | Saab | Zastava |
| Model | 05-Sep | 750 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1962 |
| Engine Size | 1985 cc | 766 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 188 HP | 24 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 300 Nm | 46 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1390 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2010 mm |
