1999 Saturn SL vs. 2011 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2011 Ford Ranger is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Saturn SL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Saturn SL would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford Ranger (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1999 Saturn SL. (100 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1999 Saturn SL.
Because 2011 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Saturn SL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford Ranger (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Saturn SL. (158 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2011 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Saturn SL.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Saturn SL | 2011 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Saturn | Ford |
Model | SL | Ranger |
Year Released | 1999 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1901 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 158 Nm | 209 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5171 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1763 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1684 mm |