1999 Seat Cordoba vs. 2010 BMW 128
To start off, 2010 BMW 128 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Seat Cordoba. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Seat Cordoba would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 BMW 128 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 BMW 128 (230 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1999 Seat Cordoba. (123 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 BMW 128 should accelerate faster than 1999 Seat Cordoba.
Because 2010 BMW 128 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 BMW 128. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Seat Cordoba, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Seat Cordoba (321 Nm) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 BMW 128. (271 Nm). This means 1999 Seat Cordoba will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 BMW 128.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Seat Cordoba | 2010 BMW 128 | |
| Make | Seat | BMW |
| Model | Cordoba | 128 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1390 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 230 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 321 Nm | 271 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2659 mm |
