1999 Suzuki C2 vs. 1959 Rover P5
To start off, 1999 Suzuki C2 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Rover P5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Rover P5 would be higher. At 2,995 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Rover P5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Suzuki C2 (251 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 1959 Rover P5. (106 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Suzuki C2 should accelerate faster than 1959 Rover P5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Rover P5 weights approximately 732 kg more than 1999 Suzuki C2.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Suzuki C2 (284 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Rover P5. (222 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 1999 Suzuki C2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Rover P5.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Suzuki C2 | 1959 Rover P5 | |
| Make | Suzuki | Rover |
| Model | C2 | P5 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1600 cc | 2995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 251 HP | 106 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 284 Nm | 222 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 852 kg | 1584 kg |
