1999 Suzuki C2 vs. 2002 Acura CL
To start off, 2002 Acura CL is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Suzuki C2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Suzuki C2 would be higher. At 3,210 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Acura CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Acura CL (260 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1999 Suzuki C2. (251 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 1999 Suzuki C2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Acura CL weights approximately 728 kg more than 1999 Suzuki C2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Acura CL (315 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Suzuki C2. (284 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2002 Acura CL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Suzuki C2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Suzuki C2 | 2002 Acura CL | |
| Make | Suzuki | Acura |
| Model | C2 | CL |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1600 cc | 3210 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 251 HP | 260 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6900 RPM |
| Torque | 284 Nm | 315 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 852 kg | 1580 kg |
