1999 Suzuki C2 vs. 2003 Volvo S40
To start off, 2003 Volvo S40 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Suzuki C2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Suzuki C2 would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2003 Volvo S40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Suzuki C2 (251 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 2003 Volvo S40. (138 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Suzuki C2 should accelerate faster than 2003 Volvo S40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Volvo S40 weights approximately 573 kg more than 1999 Suzuki C2.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Suzuki C2 (284 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Volvo S40. (220 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1999 Suzuki C2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Volvo S40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Suzuki C2 | 2003 Volvo S40 | |
| Make | Suzuki | Volvo |
| Model | C2 | S40 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1600 cc | 2435 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 251 HP | 138 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 284 Nm | 220 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 852 kg | 1425 kg |
