1999 Suzuki C2 vs. 2005 Volvo V50
To start off, 2005 Volvo V50 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Suzuki C2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Suzuki C2 would be higher. At 2,521 cc (5 cylinders), 2005 Volvo V50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Suzuki C2 (251 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 2005 Volvo V50. (197 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Suzuki C2 should accelerate faster than 2005 Volvo V50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Volvo V50 weights approximately 582 kg more than 1999 Suzuki C2.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Volvo V50 (320 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Suzuki C2. (284 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2005 Volvo V50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Suzuki C2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Suzuki C2 | 2005 Volvo V50 | |
| Make | Suzuki | Volvo |
| Model | C2 | V50 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1600 cc | 2521 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 251 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 284 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 852 kg | 1434 kg |
