1999 Suzuki C2 vs. 2010 Cadillac Escalade
To start off, 2010 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Suzuki C2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Suzuki C2 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac Escalade (403 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 1999 Suzuki C2. (251 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 1999 Suzuki C2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1760 kg more than 1999 Suzuki C2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac Escalade (565 Nm @ 4300 RPM) has 281 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Suzuki C2. (284 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2010 Cadillac Escalade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Suzuki C2.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Suzuki C2 | 2010 Cadillac Escalade | |
Make | Suzuki | Cadillac |
Model | C2 | Escalade |
Year Released | 1999 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1600 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 251 HP | 403 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 284 Nm | 565 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Vehicle Weight | 852 kg | 2612 kg |