1999 Suzuki C2 vs. 2010 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Suzuki C2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Suzuki C2 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Suzuki C2 (251 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 2010 Chevrolet Malibu. (169 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Suzuki C2 should accelerate faster than 2010 Chevrolet Malibu.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Suzuki C2 (284 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Chevrolet Malibu. (217 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1999 Suzuki C2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Chevrolet Malibu.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Suzuki C2 | 2010 Chevrolet Malibu | |
Make | Suzuki | Chevrolet |
Model | C2 | Malibu |
Year Released | 1999 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1600 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 251 HP | 169 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 284 Nm | 217 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |