1999 Suzuki C2 vs. 2011 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2011 Volvo XC90 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Suzuki C2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Suzuki C2 would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Suzuki C2 (251 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 2011 Volvo XC90. (240 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Suzuki C2 should accelerate faster than 2011 Volvo XC90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 1303 kg more than 1999 Suzuki C2.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Volvo XC90 (320 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Suzuki C2. (284 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2011 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Suzuki C2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Suzuki C2 | 2011 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | Suzuki | Volvo |
| Model | C2 | XC90 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1600 cc | 3200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 251 HP | 240 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 284 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 852 kg | 2155 kg |
