1999 Suzuki Vitara vs. 2012 Chevrolet Aveo
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Suzuki Vitara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Suzuki Vitara would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Chevrolet Aveo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo (113 HP) has 34 more horse power than 1999 Suzuki Vitara. (79 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo should accelerate faster than 1999 Suzuki Vitara.
Because 1999 Suzuki Vitara is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Suzuki Vitara will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo (155 Nm) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Suzuki Vitara. (126 Nm). This means 2012 Chevrolet Aveo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Suzuki Vitara.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Suzuki Vitara | 2012 Chevrolet Aveo | |
| Make | Suzuki | Chevrolet |
| Model | Vitara | Aveo |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2012 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1590 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 79 HP | 113 HP |
| Torque | 126 Nm | 155 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4039 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1735 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1516 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2525 mm |
