1999 Toyota MR2 vs. 1968 Pontiac Firebird
To start off, 1999 Toyota MR2 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Pontiac Firebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Pontiac Firebird would be higher. At 4,100 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Pontiac Firebird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Pontiac Firebird (175 HP) has 35 more horse power than 1999 Toyota MR2. (140 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Pontiac Firebird should accelerate faster than 1999 Toyota MR2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Pontiac Firebird weights approximately 720 kg more than 1999 Toyota MR2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Toyota MR2 | 1968 Pontiac Firebird | |
| Make | Toyota | Pontiac |
| Model | MR2 | Firebird |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1968 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1794 cc | 4100 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 140 HP | 175 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1660 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2750 mm |
