1999 Volvo C70 vs. 2012 SsangYong Korando
To start off, 2012 SsangYong Korando is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Volvo C70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Volvo C70 would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 1999 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 SsangYong Korando (175 HP) has 10 more horse power than 1999 Volvo C70. (165 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 SsangYong Korando should accelerate faster than 1999 Volvo C70.
Because 2012 SsangYong Korando is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Volvo C70. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 SsangYong Korando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1999 Volvo C70 has automatic transmission and 2012 SsangYong Korando has manual transmission. 2012 SsangYong Korando will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Volvo C70 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Volvo C70 | 2012 SsangYong Korando | |
| Make | Volvo | SsangYong |
| Model | C70 | Korando |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2435 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 165 HP | 175 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4410 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.1 L/100km | 6.1 L/100km |
