1999 ZAZ Slavuta vs. 2010 Cadillac CTS

To start off, 2010 Cadillac CTS is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 ZAZ Slavuta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 ZAZ Slavuta would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac CTS (270 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 219 more horse power than 1999 ZAZ Slavuta. (51 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1999 ZAZ Slavuta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1011 kg more than 1999 ZAZ Slavuta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2010 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 ZAZ Slavuta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Cadillac CTS has automatic transmission and 1999 ZAZ Slavuta has manual transmission. 1999 ZAZ Slavuta will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Cadillac CTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: