2000 AC Aceca vs. 1951 Jeep CJ3A
To start off, 2000 AC Aceca is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 3,504 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 AC Aceca (346 HP) has 287 more horse power than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 AC Aceca weights approximately 500 kg more than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1951 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1951 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 AC Aceca (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 255 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2000 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Jeep CJ3A.
Compare all specifications:
2000 AC Aceca | 1951 Jeep CJ3A | |
Make | AC | Jeep |
Model | Aceca | CJ3A |
Year Released | 2000 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3504 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 346 HP | 59 HP |
Torque | 400 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 3130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2040 mm |