2000 AC Aceca vs. 1952 Allard K2
To start off, 2000 AC Aceca is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 AC Aceca (301 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 216 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 AC Aceca weights approximately 310 kg more than 1952 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 AC Aceca | 1952 Allard K2 | |
| Make | AC | Allard |
| Model | Aceca | K2 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 3622 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 301 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1200 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1580 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2700 mm |
