2000 AC Aceca vs. 1960 Lotus Seven
To start off, 2000 AC Aceca is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 AC Aceca (301 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 263 more horse power than 1960 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1960 Lotus Seven.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 AC Aceca | 1960 Lotus Seven | |
Make | AC | Lotus |
Model | Aceca | Seven |
Year Released | 2000 | 1960 |
Body Type | Convertible | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 1172 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1100 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2240 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 29 L |