2000 AC Aceca vs. 1962 AC Greyhound
To start off, 2000 AC Aceca is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 AC Aceca (301 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 178 more horse power than 1962 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1962 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 AC Aceca weights approximately 495 kg more than 1962 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 AC Aceca (407 Nm) has 228 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2000 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
2000 AC Aceca | 1962 AC Greyhound | |
Make | AC | AC |
Model | Aceca | Greyhound |
Year Released | 2000 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 1971 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 407 Nm | 179 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1015 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 54 L |