2000 AC Aceca vs. 1962 Alpine A 110
To start off, 2000 AC Aceca is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 AC Aceca (301 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 252 more horse power than 1962 Alpine A 110. (49 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1962 Alpine A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 AC Aceca weights approximately 935 kg more than 1962 Alpine A 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 AC Aceca | 1962 Alpine A 110 | |
Make | AC | Alpine |
Model | Aceca | A 110 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1962 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 956 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1140 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2140 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 38 L |