2000 AC Aceca vs. 1962 Aston Martin DBR2
To start off, 2000 AC Aceca is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Aston Martin DBR2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Aston Martin DBR2 would be higher. At 4,163 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Aston Martin DBR2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 AC Aceca (346 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1962 Aston Martin DBR2. (311 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1962 Aston Martin DBR2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 AC Aceca | 1962 Aston Martin DBR2 | |
Make | AC | Aston Martin |
Model | Aceca | DBR2 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3504 cc | 4163 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 346 HP | 311 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 86 L |