2000 AC Aceca vs. 1963 Austin Mini Cooper

To start off, 2000 AC Aceca is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Austin Mini Cooper. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Austin Mini Cooper would be higher. At 3,504 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 AC Aceca (346 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 279 more horse power than 1963 Austin Mini Cooper. (67 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1963 Austin Mini Cooper. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 AC Aceca weights approximately 920 kg more than 1963 Austin Mini Cooper. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2000 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 Austin Mini Cooper, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 AC Aceca (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 316 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Austin Mini Cooper. (84 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2000 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Austin Mini Cooper.

Compare all specifications:

2000 AC Aceca 1963 Austin Mini Cooper
Make AC Austin
Model Aceca Mini Cooper
Year Released 2000 1963
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3504 cc 1071 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 346 HP 67 HP
Engine RPM 6500 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 400 Nm 84 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 4500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 83 mm 70.6 mm
Engine Stroke Size 81 mm 68.3 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.0:1 9.0:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1610 kg 690 kg
Vehicle Length 4640 mm 3060 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1400 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1350 mm
Wheelbase Size 2300 mm 2040 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 90 L 25 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]