2000 AC Aceca vs. 1964 Renault Dauphine
To start off, 2000 AC Aceca is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Renault Dauphine. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Renault Dauphine would be higher. At 3,504 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 AC Aceca (346 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 308 more horse power than 1964 Renault Dauphine. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1964 Renault Dauphine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 AC Aceca weights approximately 978 kg more than 1964 Renault Dauphine. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 AC Aceca (400 Nm) has 343 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Renault Dauphine. (57 Nm). This means 2000 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Renault Dauphine.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 AC Aceca | 1964 Renault Dauphine | |
| Make | AC | Renault |
| Model | Aceca | Dauphine |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3504 cc | 845 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 346 HP | 38 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 400 Nm | 57 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 58 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 80 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 632 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2280 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 38 L |
