2000 AC Aceca vs. 1965 MG MGC
To start off, 2000 AC Aceca is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 MG MGC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 MG MGC would be higher. At 3,504 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 AC Aceca (346 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 198 more horse power than 1965 MG MGC. (148 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1965 MG MGC.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 AC Aceca (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 226 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 MG MGC. (174 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2000 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 MG MGC.
Compare all specifications:
2000 AC Aceca | 1965 MG MGC | |
Make | AC | MG |
Model | Aceca | MGC |
Year Released | 2000 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3504 cc | 2912 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 346 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 174 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2560 mm |