2000 AC Aceca vs. 1966 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 2000 AC Aceca is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,954 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 AC Aceca (346 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1966 Cadillac DeVille. (288 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1966 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 394 kg more than 2000 AC Aceca.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 AC Aceca | 1966 Cadillac DeVille | |
| Make | AC | Cadillac |
| Model | Aceca | DeVille |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3504 cc | 6954 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 346 HP | 288 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 2004 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 5700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2030 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 82 L |
