2000 AC Aceca vs. 1967 Alpine A 110
To start off, 2000 AC Aceca is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 3,504 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 AC Aceca (346 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 297 more horse power than 1967 Alpine A 110. (49 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1967 Alpine A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 AC Aceca weights approximately 1035 kg more than 1967 Alpine A 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 AC Aceca | 1967 Alpine A 110 | |
Make | AC | Alpine |
Model | Aceca | A 110 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 3504 cc | 955 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 346 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 65 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 8.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1140 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2140 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 38 L |