2000 AC Aceca vs. 1967 TVR Griffith
To start off, 2000 AC Aceca is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 TVR Griffith. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 TVR Griffith would be higher. At 4,727 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 TVR Griffith is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 AC Aceca (346 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1967 TVR Griffith. (229 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1967 TVR Griffith. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 AC Aceca weights approximately 740 kg more than 1967 TVR Griffith. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 AC Aceca | 1967 TVR Griffith | |
Make | AC | TVR |
Model | Aceca | Griffith |
Year Released | 2000 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3504 cc | 4727 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 346 HP | 229 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 870 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 3560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1230 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2170 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 71 L |