2000 AC Aceca vs. 1970 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2000 AC Aceca is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 3,504 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1970 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 AC Aceca | 1970 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | AC | Mitsubishi |
Model | Aceca | Colt |
Year Released | 2000 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3504 cc | 1497 cc |
Horse Power | 346 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |