2000 AC Aceca vs. 1972 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 2000 AC Aceca is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 3,504 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 AC Aceca (346 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 311 more horse power than 1972 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1972 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 AC Aceca weights approximately 755 kg more than 1972 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 AC Aceca | 1972 Zastava 850 K | |
| Make | AC | Zastava |
| Model | Aceca | 850 K |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1972 |
| Engine Size | 3504 cc | 848 cc |
| Horse Power | 346 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2010 mm |
